The Dynamics of Judicial Administration in the Rule of Law Management System

Yapiter Marpi

doi:10.53276/eligible.v1i1.12

Authors

Yapiter Marpi Universitas Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53276/eligible.v1i1.12

Keywords:

Dynamics, Administration, Management Systems, Justice

Abstract

Indonesian state system has been systematized into Triaspolitika management administratively into a state of law in accordance with the provisions of Article 24 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Indonesia of republic which states that judicial power is exercised by a Supreme Court Body and judicial bodies under it within the general court environment environment of religious court, environment of military court, environment of state administrative court, and by a Constitutional Court. The dynamic tendency of the judicial administration system to have administrative management duties respectively. The aim of the author is to focus more on the judicial administration system which has not yet optimized functional performance. This research uses normative juridical supported by socio-legal legal materials in a literary manner and supported by descriptive analytical. The conclusion of this research is that the results of the analysis of the Administrative Court are deemed necessary for reform, monitoring and evaluation, because it is seen as a court place for cases that are specific itself. With the existence of a court that specifically confidence and confidence in the decisions given in an administrative case and there will be no doubts because, accountable, simple and fulfill the management administration system

References

Aju Putrijanti, L. T. L. dan K. W. U. (2017). Model Fungsi Pengawasan Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Sebagai Upaya Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Mimbar Hukum, 29(2), 263–275.

Anggraeni, R., Albar, A. A., Wijaya, E., Anggraeni, R., & Albar, A. A. (2020). Peran Association Of Southeast Asian Nations Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Perdagangan Internasional Di Kawasan Asia Tenggara. 13, 173–184.

Herowati Poesoko, A. A. S. L. D. (2020). The Role of Legal Opinion as Legal Problem Solving Method. Sociological Jurusprudence Journal, 3(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.3.1.1513.19-27

Maphalala, M. C., & Adigun, O. T. (2021). A cademics ’ Experience of Implementing E -Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution. 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p

Massiri, S. D., Nugroho, B., Kartodihardjo, H., & Soekmadi, R. (2019). Institutional sustainability of a community conservation agreement in lore lindu national park. Forest and Society, 3(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5204

Miles, B. Mathew., Huberman, A. Michael dan Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Source Book (Third Edit). Arizona State University.

Permana, D. (2010). Implementation Impact of Law No . 4 Year 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining Towards Mineral and Coal Business Development. Indonesian Mining Journal, 13(2-June), 47–54.

Sabel, J. K. & C. (2021). The Uncertain Future of Administrative Law. Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 150(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3780796

Sudrajat, J. R. dan A. S. (2012). Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Kebijakan Layanan Publik. Nuansa.

Suhartoyo. (2019). Implementasi Fungsi Pelayanan Publik dalam Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP). Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 2(1), 143–151.

Wahyunadi, Y. M. (2016). Kompetensi Absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1), 135–154.

Yapiter Marpi, Erlangga, B. T. E. and K. N. (2021). Legal Effective of Putting “Business as Usual” Clause in Agreements. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10(Law), 58–70. https://doi.org//10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.09